The image is exported to Luminar as a new TIFF file. That is why it is best to use the option “Edit a Copy With Lightroom Adjustments”. The option open in Luminar does not work with every system. Using the Luminar plugin is a bit tricky. I use the option “Edit a Copy With Lightroom Adjustments” when I use Luminar. When I use Photoshop, there is the option “Open in Photoshop”. I will start the timer from the moment I transfer the image to Luminar or Photoshop, and I will end the timer the moment I have the image back in Lightroom again. In both situations I start from within Lightroom. Unfortunately I use the Dutch language for my software, but I think you get the idea how it works if you see the screenshots. The method I use for Photoshop is called blending mask. I think Photoshop has the benefit of being able to see the sky you are going to use, while Luminar does not show the sky until you use it. To make the comparison as honest as possible, I used just one sky in Luminar and one sky from my personal library in Photoshop. I choose a real estate image, a landscape image with hills in the back, and a difficult landscape image with trees breaking through the horizon. The Experiment With Three Different Imagesįor this experiment I have taken three different images that have a boring sky. That is when I started to wonder if the sky replacement tool of Luminar is really that much precise and quicker. I find it much more flexible and easier to correct compared to Luminar. In those situations it can take a lot of time to get it right.Īfter trying Luminar for a couple of times, I went back to Photoshop for replacing a sky. There are options to change the transition with a few parameters, or you can add an extra mask to repair the parts where the transition has gone wrong. It is possible to manipulate the mask in Luminar. In those situations the end result may need more work. The difference between foreground and sky is not always that clear, especially when white walls or borders are present. The so-called artificial intelligent algorithms recognize sky, and mask the sky very efficiently. You can transfer an image from Lightroom into Luminar, replace the sky, and return to Lightroom again. But is it faster and easier compared to Photoshop?Īt first sight you may think Luminar offers a much easier method of replacing the sky. For that Luminar offers a great tool, which is very quick and easy. Some agents insist on replacing a dull overcast sky. Replacing a boring sky for something more appealing will make the premises more interesting for buyers. I don’t want to get into the same discussion, but I would like to take a closer look at its use for real estate photography, and perhaps for landscapes also. If you are interested in this article, you can find it over here: “ How Useful Is Sky Replacement in Luminar 4 and Should You Use It?” I wrote an article about Sky Replacement in Luminar.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |